Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
ASPA is seeking member input for this discussion. If you would like to comment on this article, please click the ‘Post A Comment’ link below. You must be a registered reader (its free!) and logged in to post a comment. Registered readers also receive a weekly notice of the site’s newest postings. Watch ASPA’s enewsletter The Bridge, the ASPA Blog and the upcoming PA TIMES August/September print issue for more information on this discussion.
Jim Svara, Jim Nordin
The subject of a code of ethics for ASPA has been a
controversial one for several decades.
The current code, which dates back to 1994, is seen by many as outdated
and in need of fundamental revision.
Others feel that revisiting the code, even if it leads to little or no
change in the existing document, has value as a way of reconnecting ASPA
members to the ethical issues addressed in the code. Almost everyone agrees
that 17 years is a long time for a code to exist without a thorough review. To
this end, ASPA leadership has created a working group co-chaired by James
Nordin and James Svara to explore the current code and report back on how to
proceed with changes to the code.
The committee is broadly representative of ASPA membership and includes
a number of individuals with expertise in the area of ethics.
The committee has had lively exchanges among its members and
in open meetings with ASPA rank and file at the Baltimore conference. At that meeting it was agreed that it
would be useful to have a “point–counterpoint” exchange on how extensive the
changes to the code could and should be.
These essays are
polemics in the sense of presenting a one-sided argument, with the recognition
that the other side will have an equal opportunity to present its view that a
more comprehensive change is best.
Arguments in Favor of Rewriting the Current Code
University of Kentucky
The major argument for a significant rewrite is not based on
disagreement with contents of the existing code, which lists a set of admirable
behaviors for all public servants (and, indeed, all citizens), but on an
assessment that the existing document is not the most effective tool ASPA could
use to increase the likelihood that members will incorporate ethical
considerations as a primary factor in their professional choices. The “rewrite”
being suggested here would not entail developing a different list of ethical
rules than the existing code, but would distill the existing rules into the
basic underlying principle to be used as the core test of actions taken by all
All professional actions should be accountable for promoting the public
interest above serving oneself.
All individual elements in the existing code arise from this
central ethical principle. “Promoting the public interest” implies
transparency, efficiency, fairness, civility, competence, and other features of
effective public administration. The rewrite proposal is that the simple
statement above become the official ASPA code of ethics. There are three major
arguments that this approach could be more effective in increasing ethical
awareness among members.
The rules contained in the existing (or even an expanded)
code could be effectively used along with other types of training materials and
activities to help individuals gain practice in incorporating specific ethical
considerations into their own particular situations. But what is most needed
from ASPA at this time is not a longer or more complex list of rules, but a
simple and direct marketing strategy that encourages members to remember to
always consider whether their individual professional actions meet the basic
ethical test for all public servants – that the professional decisions they
make do not benefit themselves at the expense of the public who pays them.
Revisiting the ASPA Code of Ethics: The Case for Incremental Change
Jeremy F. Plant, Penn
The chief arguments for limited and incremental change are
based largely on the strengths of the existing code:
What is needed is not a fundamental reorganization or
rewriting of the code, but a significant update with incremental changes to
represent important drivers of change in the environment of public administration. The process, now underway led by a
broadly representative group of ASPA members is itself beneficial by
stimulating interest in and knowledge of the existing code. The most logical approach is to accept
the continued relevance of the five major principles – Serve the Public
Interest; Respect the Constitution and the Law; Demonstrate Personal Integrity;
Promote Ethical Organizations; and Strive for Professional Excellence. Then, the focus can be on the more
specific explanatory or illustrative statements which follow from each major
principle. These are now stated as
imperatives: exercise, promote,
oppose, respond, understand, eliminate, encourage, accept, allocate, enhance, recognize,
subordinate, respect, guard, maintain, ensure, work to improve, provide,
conduct, take responsibility. In
each of the five major categories there are between four and eight such
hortatory statements. Should this
approach remain the best way to illustrate the broad principles, or should
there be examples, either based on real or hypothetical situations, to educate
ASPA members on acting ethically in specific situations or context?
These numbered statements in the code form the basis for
understanding the meaning of the broad principles in the practice of public administration. They provide a link between the broad
ethical principles and the practice of the profession. Still, some sound dated. For example, in the first canon of
Serve the Public Interest, statement two might better read “Oppose all forms of
discrimination and harassment, and promote diversity”
than the present wording of promoting “affirmative
action,” which is only one means of promoting and managing diversity. Some are irrelevant or inoperative for some
members, for example elected officials or appointed agents who cannot be
expected to “conduct official acts without partisanship.” In other areas,
outside events have changed the nature of professional responsibilities. For instance, what needs to be said
about the use of torture in national and homeland security? Should the code continue to be based
largely on deontological and virtue ethics, or admit to elements of
consequentialism in defense of the nation? Should there somewhere be an explicit recognition
of the need to acquire ethical competence, as part of the striving for
professional excellence? By
focusing the attention of the working group and involved ASPA members on these
points, the code will indeed be the living document that every professional
Share your views with
the task force by contacting Jim Nordin [[email protected] ] and Jim Svara [[email protected] ] or joining a breakfast forum on the Code
at the SECOPA conference in New Orleans, Friday, September 23, at 7:00 a.m.