Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of ASPA as an organization.
By Michael Popejoy
November 29, 2016
Many graduate students—particularly new students who may or may not have had direct public work experience—must learn to engage in discussions on controversial or sensitive public policy issues. This is part of the public policy, political and social processes endemic to certain degree programs and careers.
Students seeking a career in public service, as well as other venues, must learn to take part in difficult debates on critical issues without taking offense or creating a more hostile environment by use of inappropriate language or overt attitudes. This is essential to the development of mature professionals in professions such as public administration, public health, health administration, social services administration, criminal justice (courts and police community leadership), education and to majors leading to future corporate leadership positions.
In higher education, the one predictable aspect is that students are unpredictable. All professors face each course they teach from two directions. Either they can work to maintain students in their collective “happy place” in an effort to be both popular and maintain the best potential possible for high ratings from student evaluations of their performance, or they can take the road that forces students to confront the current policy and political realities—regardless of the consequences. This is obviously the less pleasant road. It is also far more risky to the professor’s career; particularly adjuncts who are easily dismissed at the hint of student dissatisfaction.
Psychologists have found that adults are fairly hardwired in their personalities and world views by the time they reach their mid-20s. However, current statistics suggest the average adult student in U.S. colleges is more than 30 years old, with many in their 40s, 50s or even older. It is a given that students will have hardened personal world views and there will be significant tension in the classroom as these worldviews are challenged by the revelation of new information. The result will often be intense discussions with the potential for open hostility and resentment toward the source of this new information—which is the professor and/or the textbook selected by the professor or the university. Adults do not surrender or modify their views lightly and will often argue vehemently the position they have held for many years, even in the face of overwhelming evidence challenging their strongly held beliefs.
What are some topics that lead to tension and conflict in class discussions? A partial list includes abortion, capital punishment, profiling by law enforcement, poverty and welfare, health care, gun control, prison systems and incarceration, low-income housing, homeland security policies and procedures, and virtually every public policy currently under consideration.
The question for university faculty and administrators becomes: are we doing students a disservice by purposely avoiding the tensions created by new information? Are we avoiding hostility and resentment in the classroom because of potential grievances and poor evaluations from students who are offended by such discussions? This is where the “courage to teach” becomes a reality instead of a cliché. Professors can avoid controversy by staying on safe ground or actively engage students in the important controversial issues that pervade the particular discipline being taught.
Professors must prepare students for culture shocks and have a strong grasp on topics that have an emotional impact. Preparation should begin in the syllabus (a statement on civility in the classroom). Further, in the course introduction, professors should tell students what to expect by drawing their attention to the section in the syllabus where civility and critical thinking is discussed. Finally, professors should engage in a frank and open discussion in class (or online) in the first class session to be sure students understand what to expect in the course.
Author: Michael W. Popejoy, M.B.A., Ph.D., M.P.H., M.S., FRSPH is cross trained with his Ph.D. in public administration and an M.P.H. in public health from a CEPH accredited school. He also teaches both graduate public administration and graduate public health. Email:[email protected]