Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of ASPA as an
By John Pearson
March 11, 2016
I believe it is wrong to think that everything would be fine if government agencies just emphasized the needs of their customers as opposed to the needs of the bureaucracy. The book, Reinventing Government, takes the opposite view. Chapter 6 is titled, “Customer-Driven Government: Meeting the Needs of the Customer, not the Bureaucracy.” The chapter goes on to advocate improving customer service and greatly increasing customer participation in government.
The main reason customer driven government is not realistic is that government agencies have many demands on them that are not related to customer service or participation. Only a very limited amount of an agency’s scarce resources can be devoted to customer service. Private organizations, however, are in an entirely different situation. They control their product line in a way that government agencies do not. They can choose to cut back costly and difficult products and services and do more customer service if they feel it would help the bottom line. I explored this issue in an earlier column.
Consider that the IRS now has over 2,000 forms and pamphlets on its website. For example, Publication 15-B, Employers Tax Guide to Fringe Benefits, gives 31 pages of instruction to the public on just this one issue. Think of the efforts at the IRS just to implement the rules pertaining to fringe benefits. In addition to Publication 15-B, implementation no doubt includes regulations, circulars, memoranda, internal manuals, training guides, forms and computer programming.
The IRS could just ignore a difficult issue like fringe benefits and devote the resources saved to improving customer service. A business might make such as decision about one of its services. But the IRS isn’t going to do that because they must implement all laws assigned to them.
In my recent column on program implementation, I outlined some issues an agency needs to consider to implement legislation. Most of this work is not related to customer service. And, once the initial implementation work for a program is done, an agency can’t just rest and devote all of its energy to customer service.
Ongoing program implementation puts many demands on an agency’s resources. These are legitimate demands and may not be dismissed as “meeting the needs of the bureaucracy” as Reinventing claims.
Here are some ongoing issues that an agency’s program staff must deal with:
Quality is major value that directly competes for resources that could go to customer service and participation. In the federal government, there is a huge emphasis on preventing improper payments (both overpayments and underpayments). Systems and procedures designed to protect the taxpayers from overpayments often take resources that could otherwise be devoted to customer service. They may even impact customer service in a negative way (e.g., more questions on forms, review of more information sources, more decisional reviews and delays).
Let me acknowledge that the customer service of government agencies has improved since the days of Reinventing Government. I have had recent experience with the Virginia DMV, the Office of Personnel Management, the Social Security Administration, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and the Thrift Savings Plan. Each of these agencies offers informative websites, online accounts, online self-service transactions and call centers devoted to customer questions.
Although customer service in government is gradually improving, I don’t believe “customer driven” government, as described in Reinventing Government, is feasible. Fully implementing legislation and quality are higher values for government agencies than customer service. Perhaps smaller, well-off communities could have customer driven government if they were willing to budget for it.
Author: John Pearson recently retired from a lengthy career in the federal government where he was a program analyst. He has an MPA and a bachelor’s degree in economics. He now writes columns reflecting on his experience in government. His email is [email protected].