Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone
EDITOR’S NOTE: We continue our publication of the ASPA Founders’ Forum Fellow (FFF) papers with this piece, number 9 of 12. As stated previously, the papers will appear in alphabetical order, with two papers posted each week until all 12 are online.
Public administration suffers from what I like to call a “schizophrenic re-identification tendency”–a habitual predisposition of answering its hardest questions by falling into a theory or practice frenzy of repackaging old concepts into new shiny boxes. Every two decades or so, the field vehemently rejects everything that has been previously done and assertively marches into the future guided by the promise of a new theoretical, methodological or managerial fad…only to dismiss the new approach to a renegade status a few years later. The script seldom changes and even the play of the actors appears painfully similar throughout each cycle.
The re-identification dynamics were probably jump started, at least in their modern form, by the works of Herbert Simon (1946, 1947) and Dwight Waldo (1948). Both academics built their careers on pointing out what is wrong with public administration. At the same time, despite their most genuine efforts (especially in the case of Simon’s later work) both intellectuals failed to develop anything remotely similar to a fundamental framework. The area lost the prestige that it enjoyed before the 1950s. One would easily argue that the standing that public administration enjoyed, prior to Simon/Waldo’s critiques, was legitimized by illusionary dichotomies such as politics-administration or private-public–thus making their critiques necessary. Yes. This is clearly the case. However, such shattering theoretical attacks on the field’s fundamentals, pushed public administration into an unremitting swirling search of identification and legitimization.
Within the broader contexts of: the failure of the Great Society experiment, the inability of Keynesian economics to deal with supply side shocks and the infatuation of social science theories and economic narratives with the potency of the self-interested/rational individual to attain efficiency–public administration was not able to generate a credible academic defensive stand against becoming the favorite target of a freshly coined anti-governmental culture. This had at least three dramatic consequences: it led to a growing gap between theory and practice, with the former rarely contributing to the latter, it generated a perpetuating and self-enforcing chaotic development of theory within the field, which caused fragmentation and an inability to develop a solid framework or credibility, and incapacity to construct a convincing campaign in support of government and governance.
If administrators do not acknowledge the benefits and advocate public administration–who will?
Public Administration Brand Building Strategies
The current condition will not surprise anyone. Fortunately, I believe that the field has what it takes to rediscover its once prestigious footing. Surprisingly, the current global political and economic contexts offer the most opportune environment for improving the public administration brand and reshaping the anti-government discourse. As Milton Friedman argued, when times get tough we are all Keynesians.
In part none of the following suggestions will be sufficient, but in sum they will be able to reconstruct the framework of beliefs and expectations necessary for a strong public administration brand.
Education, education and some more education…
As it is often the case, education is at the core of any transformative action. The acceptance and growth of the PA brand will be possible only in the context that practitioners, academics and citizens become involved in an administrative learning process (communicating/participating/learning). Education represents the only realistic way of reshaping the values that lie at the base of the anti-government culture. The value transformation will not be easy, but in the long the adequate standing of the field and the democratic administration of this country depends on the success of building a strong and credible public administration brand.
Alexandru Roman is a student at Florida Atlantic University. Email: [email protected]
Constructive comments and responses to the papers are encouraged and can be submitted directly to the scholar at their email address listed below each article, or by clicking on Post A Comment below each article.