Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone

Collaborative Decision-Making to End Child Poverty

The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of ASPA as an organization.

By David Kenneth Waldman
July 31, 2015

The future of society depends on the extent of civil and human rights granted to children. “Children are the future” has become an axiom. Nonetheless, according to the National Center for Children in Poverty, “More than 16 million children in the United States – 22 percent of all children – live in families with incomes below the federal poverty level.” Although political leaders, special interest groups, civil society and policy-makers are tasked with writing policies that affect children and youth, yet there is no participatory mechanism for them to be part of the policymaking process. Why is there no collaborative policymaking model for children rights in the United States?

Collaborative policymaking and politics

Partisan politics in the United States has prevented ratification of The Convention on the Rights of the Child by Congress. The Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC), Article 12, represents the respect for the views of the child. This assumes that there is a collaborative model where children are part of a decision-making process. When political leaders make policy decisions which affect children, do children have the right to express their opinions?

Conservatives in Congress that oppose the ratification of the CRC speak of the plethora of laws that already protect children. The argument advanced is that children are already protected in the United States more than anywhere else in the world. I argue that protection of children is not an alternative to granting age appropriate access in order for children to express ideas and views that directly affect their well-being. 

ASPA code of ethics

Public policy decisions made by Congress affects every aspect of our lives such as marriage equality, health care, early childhood education, minimum wage, free access to higher education, civil rights, voting rights and community based policing. Yet, there is no collaborative policy model to include the considerations of children. If we are to uphold the American Society Public Administrators’ updated Code of Ethics, do we then have an obligation to listen to children?

In particular, reflect on the first six ethical standards and consider that “the public interest and good” includes children.

ASPA Code of Ethics (partial list)

1. Advance the Public Interest. Promote the interests of the public.

2. Uphold the Constitution and the Law.  Respect and support government constitutions and laws, while seeking to improve laws and policies to promote the public good.  

3. Promote democratic participation.  Inform the public and encourage active engagement in governance.  Be open, transparent and responsive, and respect and assist all persons in their dealings with public organizations.

4. Strengthen social equity. Treat all persons with fairness, justice, and equality and respect individual differences, rights and freedoms. Promote affirmative action and other initiatives to reduce unfairness, injustice and inequality in society.

5. Fully Inform and Advise.  Provide accurate, honest, comprehensive, and timely information and advice to elected and appointed officials and governing board members, and to staff members in your organization.

6. Demonstrate personal integrity.  Adhere to the highest standards of conduct to inspire public confidence and trust in public service.

It is time for ASPA to take the lead and redefine for the public what it means to represent children.

Cross sector collaboration with civil society

Public policy collaboration with civil society has been proven successful in practice. A partnership with local community based organizations would enable a means to reach children in any constituency. For example, a policy focused on early childhood education may become an important first step toward including children’s feelings. Cross-sector collaboration with civil society, with support from public managers, requires an educated public on the importance of listening to children. An expertise to educate and implement programs that addresses complex social issues necessitates an enlightened populace and public managers who consider children’s perspective.


There is a need to empower public managers to implement policy which supports recommendations from children. Policy decisions are informed best when children are included and the implication is they are not making the decisions. Research from Miller on parent-child collaborative decision-making offers a model for a policy makers, public managers and political leaders. The achievement of the ethical code of ASPA is dependent on the inclusion of the entire public, which includes children. The question is how to educate public policy leaders with a new policy method that includes active input from children.

Asking children to contribute to civics as a reality, and not as a subject they take in high school, creates a potential for significant positive social change. It is time for policymaking in the United States to listen to all children.

Children living below the poverty income level is a stark reality. Who knows what is required to solve this social ill better than they do?  I call for a dialogue among all who are part of a policy decision-making process to include children. Policy that is based on the assimilation of ideas from all sectors and actors, including children, will then give credence to the statement “children are our future.”

Author: David Kenneth Waldman is founder, president and CEO of To Love Children Educational Foundation International Inc. He received his Ph.D. from the School of Public Policy and Public Administration at Walden University. The author can be reached at www.tolovechildren.org or [email protected]

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)

4 Responses to Collaborative Decision-Making to End Child Poverty

  1. dennis thompson Reply

    October 24, 2015 at 7:18 am

    Have you ever been married and have any children? Probably not! You think because you ‘worked’ around children that you are an expert?!?! Having a child/children helping make their own decisions is ridiculous! Where/how do you come up with these ‘conclusions’, obviously without using FACTS. A little lesson from someone that has raised a family, children can not decide for themselves especially ones in poverty situations!

  2. Tammie Jones Reply

    August 28, 2015 at 8:10 pm

    The article was very interesting. A collaborative policy model is very much needed and would indeed be beneficial. The article makes valid points and the last statement “children are our future”, is quite true.

  3. Dr. Ravinder Rena Reply

    August 27, 2015 at 7:10 am

    Its nice thought provoking pitch that emphasizes the children involvement in the policy design… I love the concluding remarks.

    Dr. Ravinder Rena

    University of the Western Cape
    Capetown, South Africa

  4. James Barr Reply

    August 27, 2015 at 7:07 am

    Dear Dr. Waldman,

    My comments are as follows:

    1) The article does not provide references, child poverty is a soft social science and the respective research is qualitative in nature that derives meaning from context.
    2) Maslow described the psychological needs as the first step in satisfying those needs, children may not be aware of those needs because of the prevailing environment established by parental guidance and control. Therefore, consent is required because children are unaware and cannot comprehend what they need.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *