Widgetized Section

Go to Admin » Appearance » Widgets » and move Gabfire Widget: Social into that MastheadOverlay zone

Energy Nirvana

The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of ASPA as an organization.

By David Howard Davis
September 25, 2015

Energy policy has been turned upside down in recent years. When I published the first edition of Energy Politics in 1974, we were in the midst of the so called “energy crisis.” The Arab boycott of 1973, reinforced by OPEC, had sent the price from $3 a barrel to $12 in a year (the equivalent of $55 when adjusted for inflation). This caused a Republican president, Richard Nixon, to impose price controls and establish new agencies in a fashion reminiscent of the New Deal. We got the Federal Energy Administration and the Energy Research and Development Administration. Jimmy Carter added the Department of Energy and briefly the Synthetic Fuels Corporation.

With the Reagan Administration, we shifted away from command and control to a supposed market solution, which continued in a roughly stable form for three decades. Nevertheless there are many governmental influences. Requirements for ethanol blended into gasoline prop up the price of corn. Nearly half the crop in Iowa goes into automobile fuel tanks. The Energy Policy Act of 1992 experimented with electricity deregulation, resulting in blackouts in California and turmoil in the nuclear industry. Tax laws favor petroleum companies, for example in the form of low rates for exploration and production equipment or treating foreign royalties as if they were taxes that can be deducted from US taxes. Coal, while not as privileged as petroleum, enjoys benefits such as favorable taxation in mining and burning to generate electricity. The cost to dig coal from federal land in the West is low.

images - D. Davis

The cause of the relative stability in energy policy was stable costs. To simplify and adjust for inflation, a barrel of oil cost $110 in 1980, the peak of the energy crisis; $30 from 1986 to 2002; $90 in 2011 to 2014 and $50 for the past nine months. The wild card has been natural gas, now in high supply due to fracking. Fracking also makes more oil recoverable. In addition, we are more efficient in burning and refining oil. The U.S. imports only 27 percent, compared to 60 percent in 2006. Furthermore 37 percent of our imports come from Canada. Gasoline prices at the pump are low; last week I paid $1.89 a gallon. We are close to the “energy independence” sought since 1973.

The price of coal has also dropped sharply, now $48 per ton. One effect has been to punish the producing companies in the stock market. In six years, 26 have gone bankrupt and stocks have lost 76 percent of their value. In contrast, natural gas production has increased by 50 percent at the same time from 1.8 trillion cubic feet in 1980 to 2.7 TCF today. Prices have dropped from $13 MCF in 1980 to $2.70. (Moreover the number of coal miners, formerly a powerful group of voters, has dropped. Today there are only 80,000.)

Lower prices for oil, natural gas and coal would seem to point to an energy nirvana. The economy will prosper and consumers will benefit. Ratcheting up environmental protection will be relatively painless. Indeed the economic growth rate last quarter was 3.7 percent. Reduced imports from the Middle East will diminish our need for military action there. The stars seem to be aligned.

Is this the time for major reforms? A carbon tax? Ending mountain top removal for coal mining? Ending the subsidies for ethanol? Ending subsidies for Exxon and BP? Withdrawing the 5th Fleet from the Persian Gulf?_____________________________________________________________________________

Author: Davis teaches public administration at the University of Toledo. He is the author of Energy Politics, which has had four editions. Email: [email protected].

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (1 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *